US Bipartisan Coalition Advances Film Tourism and Federal Tax Credits to Rival Overseas Production Hubs

The Motion Picture, Television, and Entertainment Revitalization Act establishes federal tax credits to keep film sets in American towns, powering long-term screen tourism.
WASHINGTON, Oct 31 (Nomad Lawyer) — An unprecedented national coalition of Capitol Hill lawmakers, Hollywood studio leaders, and hospitality trade associations has mobilized behind sweeping federal legislation designed to repatriate runaway film productions and ignite a high-yield screen tourism boom across the American heartland. Spearheaded by 62 bipartisan co-sponsors across both chambers of Congress, the Motion Picture, Television, and Entertainment Revitalization Act establishes a landmark 20% to 30% federal tax credit framework aimed at transforming small-town filming locations into permanent, recession-resistant tourism economies capable of outperforming aggressive overseas subsidy hubs.
[!NOTE] Legislative Overview: Formally introduced and referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Finance, the Revitalization Act establishes a 20% base federal labor credit with additive bonus tiers reaching up to 30% for rural and multi-state productions. The legislation unites the American Hotel & Lodging Association (AHLA), the U.S. Travel Association, the Motion Picture Association (MPA), and entertainment labor guilds in a high-stakes campaign targeted for enactment during the year-end congressional session.
FEDERAL FILM INCENTIVE & SCREEN-TOURISM ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER
| Column 1 |
|---|
| [Legislative Trigger] -----------> Motion Picture Revitalization Act |
| 20% Base Labor Credit + 10% Rural/Indie Bonuses |
| v |
| [Fiscal Stacking Model] ---------> Federal Credits + State Rebates (GA, NM, NY, PA) |
| Total Effective Production Rebate: 40% - 55% |
| v |
| [Repatriation Catalyst] ---------> Neutralizes UK, Canada, & Australia Subsidies |
| Halts 45% Foreign Production Flight Threshold |
| +------------------------------------------------+------------------------+ |
| v v |
| [Phase 1: In-Production Infusion] [Phase 2: Perpetual Screen Yield] |
| Direct Call-Sheet Stimulus Long-Tail Streaming Visibility |
| - Hotel room block buyouts - Set-jetting cultural travelers |
| - Local catering & family diners - Curated film walking tours |
| - Regional lumber & trade equipment - Historic downtown revitalization |
| - High-wage below-the-line payroll - Year-round municipal tax base |
| v |
| [Strategic Sovereign Objective] |
| Cement American Landscapes as the World's Visual Stage |
| Convert Fleeting Film Sets into Permanent High-Yield Destinations |
The Architecture of Set-Jetting: Converting On-Screen Exposure into Lasting Tourism Yield
The contemporary dynamics of global media distribution and on-demand streaming have fundamentally restructured the traditional travel-planning funnel. International and domestic travelers no longer consume cinematic stories in passive isolation; instead, audiences actively seek to inhabit the physical environments depicted on their screens. This cultural phenomenon, widely recognized across the global travel industry as "set-jetting," has transformed film and television productions from ephemeral entertainment events into long-term engines of municipal economic development.
When an American municipality hosts a major feature film or scripted episodic series, the resulting economic benefits unfold across two distinct, highly lucrative phases. The first phase consists of the immediate in-production capital infusion. During principal photography, a high-budget studio production functions effectively as an immediate economic stimulus package. Cast members, directors, and extensive technical crews occupy regional hotels, patronize family-owned restaurants, lease fleets of commercial vehicles, and contract regional trade specialists ranging from master carpenters and scenic painters to local electricians and sound engineers.
The second phase, however, represents the true economic prize: perpetual screen-tourism yield. Long after the soundstages are struck, equipment trucks depart, and the production wrap party concludes, the featured landscapes and historic streetscapes remain permanently accessible on global streaming platforms. This perpetual digital exposure creates a multi-year visitor pipeline that transcends conventional vacation seasonality. Travelers drawn by cinematic storytelling spend significantly higher discretionary sums than standard leisure tourists, booking extended stays at boutique inns, purchasing tickets for curated walking tours, dining in historic downtowns, and generating sustained tax revenues for municipal services.
| Economic Phase | Operational Duration | Primary Revenue Influx Channels | Key Municipal Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Immediate In-Production Stimulus | 3 to 9 months of active principal photography | Hotel room blocks, corporate rentals, catering, hardware suppliers, heavy machinery leases, local trade payroll | Independent hoteliers, local diners, trade unions, equipment rental yards, regional fuel distributors |
| Phase 2: Perpetual Screen-Tourism Yield | 5 to 15+ years following theatrical or streaming release | Themed walking excursions, heritage lodging, specialty retail, location photography fees, food-trail visits | Municipal tax authorities, boutique merchants, tour operators, historic preservation societies |
| Combined Lifecycle Multiplier | Decades of compounded regional branding | International visitor arrivals, commercial business relocation, film festival development, civic pride | Entire regional ecosystem, small-town downtowns, regional airports, county infrastructure funds |
The financial velocity of set-jetting is particularly impactful because it bypasses saturated coastal metropolitan centers and channels visitor spending directly into rural, exurban, and post-industrial towns. Places that lack major amusement parks, ski resorts, or convention centers can achieve immediate global destination prominence simply by providing the atmospheric backdrop for a critically acclaimed television narrative.
The Overseas Production Exodus: Addressing the 45% Runaway Production Crisis
Despite the unparalleled worldwide resonance of American cinematic storytelling, domestic film production infrastructure and regional filming hubs have confronted a severe structural crisis over the past decade: the rapid acceleration of runaway foreign production. International jurisdictions have mounted an aggressive campaign to capture lucrative American film projects by engineering massive public subsidies, tax credits, and cash rebates that significantly undercut domestic production costs.
Recent entertainment industry data underscores the magnitude of this structural flight. Approximately 45% of all American-financed feature films and high-budget scripted series are now filmed outside the borders of the United States. This figure represents an alarming increase from just a few years earlier, when international production flight accounted for roughly one-third of major domestic projects.
The economic strategies deployed by foreign governments have been coordinated and well-capitalized. Jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia have structured national tax incentive frameworks that offer production rebates ranging from 30% to over 40% on qualified expenditures. These countries recognized that by lowering production expenses for Hollywood studios, they could achieve a twofold economic victory: securing high-paying technical jobs for their domestic workforces while turning their own castles, countryside villages, and coastlines into global tourism sensations at the expense of American communities.
| Competing International Jurisdiction | Core Film Tax Incentive Structure | Primary Strategic Advantages | Direct Economic Impact on US Tourism |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | Independent Film Tax Relief (IFTR) & Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit (AVEC) reaching up to 34%–40% | Unified national framework; world-class studio facilities in London and Scotland | Diverted major fantasy, period, and action franchises, turning UK landscapes into primary tourist magnets |
| Canada | Federal Film or Video Production Tax Credit stacked with British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec provincial rebates (35%–45%) | Favorable currency exchange rates; geographical proximity to US creative hubs | Replaced American midwestern and northwestern towns with Canadian urban and rural backdrops |
| Australia | Location Offset and Producer Offset programs providing up to 30% uncapped national cash rebates | Year-round temperate filming conditions; advanced soundstages in New South Wales and Queensland | Captured major Hollywood franchise tentpoles, shifting international tourism marketing to Australian coastlines |
| United States (Historical Baseline) | Fragmented state-by-state incentives with zero overarching federal tax credit framework | Creative talent concentration; diverse natural topography; legacy studio backlots | Lost approximately 45% of domestic production volume due to inability to stack federal relief |
The critical vulnerability in the American position was the historic absence of a harmonized national tax framework. While individual states such as Georgia, New Mexico, New York, and California developed competitive state-level incentive programs, they were forced to compete independently against sovereign nations equipped with unlimited federal treasuries. Without a unifying federal credit, American producers faced intense fiduciary pressure to relocate productions abroad, inadvertently exporting both production wages and future tourism revenues.
Legislative Deep Dive: Statutory Framework of the Revitalization Act
To reverse this production exodus and re-establish the United States as the premier production and screen-tourism destination in the world, lawmakers drafted the Motion Picture, Television, and Entertainment Revitalization Act. The legislation establishes a comprehensive, market-driven federal incentive framework designed to level the playing field against foreign competitors by directly subsidizing domestic labor expenditures.
The statutory architecture of the bill is tailored to direct capital relief toward crew-intensive, economically impactful productions while providing specific incentives for projects that locate their principal photography outside traditional metropolitan soundstage clusters.
| Statutory Provision / Metric | Statutory Parameter & Mechanism | Strategic Economic and Tourism Objective |
|---|---|---|
| Base Federal Tax Credit | 20% credit on qualified domestic labor expenditures | Directly offsets payroll costs for American below-the-line technicians and creative talent |
| Maximum Incentive Ceiling | Up to 30% through additive bonus tiers | Incentivizes productions to film in rural communities, multi-state corridors, and independent formats |
| Minimum Budget Threshold | $1,000,000 in qualified domestic production spend | Focuses federal resources on substantial, crew-intensive productions that generate hotel demand |
| Domestic Photography Mandate | $\ge 75%$ of principal photography completed in the US | Guarantees that visual backdrops showcased on screen represent authentic American locations |
| State Incentive Stacking | Fully additive and non-dilutive structure | Enables domestic producers to combine federal credits with state rebates to outprice foreign hubs |
| Labor Eligibility Scope | Comprehensive above- and below-the-line coverage | Encompasses camera operators, gaffers, carpenters, post-production VFX artisans, writers, and directors |
A cornerstone of the legislation is its domestic photography mandate, which requires that at least 75% of principal photography take place within the United States. This statutory requirement ensures that studios cannot merely utilize domestic soundstages for interior shots while filming exterior landscapes abroad. By anchoring the physical cameras to American soil, the bill guarantees that the visual environments presented to global audiences showcase real American towns, national parks, and urban centers.
Equally significant is the bill's state stacking provision. Because the federal credit is designed to be fully additive, domestic filmmakers can combine the 20% to 30% federal credit with existing state-level film rebates. For instance, a production shooting in Georgia or New Mexico can stack the federal incentive on top of 25% to 30% state credits, resulting in total effective cost offsets approaching 50%. This combined fiscal firepower effectively neutralizes the subsidy advantages historically offered by the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, providing an overwhelming financial incentive for studios to keep their productions within the United States.
The Unprecedented Coalition: Hospitality Giants Unite with Hollywood Guilds
The legislative momentum propelling the Revitalization Act is distinguished by an unprecedented alliance between industries that have historically operated in separate policy spheres. For decades, film tax credits were viewed narrowly as corporate subsidies for entertainment conglomerates. The current legislative initiative, however, has dismantled this perception by framing screen production as a foundational pillar of national tourism and hospitality infrastructure.
Recognizing that on-screen visual placement represents the single most potent form of organic destination marketing in existence, prominent travel and lodging trade associations have stepped forward as primary advocates for the bill alongside traditional Hollywood guilds.
Leading the hospitality coalition is the American Hotel & Lodging Association (AHLA), represented by senior executives including Ralph Posner. The AHLA has underscored to congressional committees that film production incentives are, in practical economic reality, tourism and lodging credits in disguise. Every domestic call sheet corresponds directly to multi-month hotel room buyouts, conference room leases, banquet bookings, and sustained employment for housekeepers, culinary staff, and hospitality managers across small and mid-sized markets.
THE UNPRECEDENTED ALLIANCE FOR DOMESTIC ENTERTAINMENT
| Column 1 |
|---|
| [Hospitality & Tourism Sector] [Entertainment Guilds & Studios] |
| - American Hotel & Lodging Association (AHLA) - Motion Picture Association (MPA) |
| - U.S. Travel Association - Independent Film Alliance (IFTA) |
| - Destination Marketing Organizations - IATSE Below-the-Line Labor Unions |
| \ / |
| \ / |
| v v |
| [CONVERGENT ECONOMIC POLICY IMPERATIVE] |
| - Protect domestic blue-collar manufacturing & trades |
| - Drive long-tail international visitor expenditure |
| - Revitalize small-town downtown retail and tax bases |
| v |
| [UNITED LEGISLATIVE VEHICLE ON CAPITOL HILL] |
| Motion Picture Revitalization Act (House & Senate) |
In parallel, the U.S. Travel Association has approached the legislation from the perspective of sovereign soft power and international visitor acquisition. Research conducted by travel economists demonstrates that prospective international travelers frequently select their vacation destinations based on emotional connections formed through cinematic storytelling. While traditional international advertising campaigns require millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for limited returns, high-quality television series and films showcase American culture, landscapes, and lifestyle organically to hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide.
On the labor front, the legislation has unified studio management and union workforces. The Motion Picture Association (MPA) and the Independent Film and Television Alliance (IFTA) have aligned closely with labor organizations representing below-the-line craftspeople, including the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE), the Teamsters, and the Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA). For these technical artisans—whose livelihoods depend on active production schedules—the bill represents essential protection against the outsourcing of middle-class entertainment careers.
Capitol Hill Dynamics: Bipartisan Momentum and Lame-Duck Strategy
In an era defined by sharp partisan polarization in Washington, the Revitalization Act has achieved remarkable bipartisan support. The legislation bypasses ideological gridlock by framing domestic film production not as a cultural battleground, but as an engine for industrial manufacturing, skilled trade employment, and regional service growth.
The co-sponsorship breakdown across both chambers of Congress demonstrates the broad geographic and political coalition backing the measure. A total of 62 lawmakers have formally attached their names as co-sponsors, representing diverse regions spanning the Pacific coast, the industrial Northeast, the Midwest, and the Deep South.
| Congressional Body / Delegation | Number of Co-Sponsors | Key Leadership & Regional Representation | Strategic Legislative Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| House of Representatives (California) | 15 Representatives | Bipartisan delegation from primary entertainment production districts | Anchors traditional studio and high-technology post-production interests |
| House of Representatives (Pennsylvania) | 6 Representatives | Bipartisan leadership representing emerging regional production hubs | Connects industrial manufacturing and historic architecture preservation |
| House of Representatives (New York) | 4 Representatives | Urban and upstate representatives backing soundstage infrastructure | Represents major media conglomerates and independent production centers |
| House of Representatives (New Jersey) | 3 Representatives | Regional delegation supporting expanding soundstage tax investments | Champions East Coast studio expansion and suburban location shooting |
| House of Representatives (Illinois) | 3 Representatives | Midwestern coalition supporting urban and rural filming corridors | Focuses on Chicago production infrastructure and midwestern tourism |
| House of Representatives (Georgia) | 3 Representatives | Southern delegation defending "Southern Hollywood" achievements | Champions rural filming benefits and local economic diversification |
| House of Representatives (Other States) | 18 Representatives | Broad geographic coalition across Southwest, Mountain West, and Florida | Ensures multi-state rural and regional bonus tiers remain robust |
| House Subtotal | 52 Representatives | 83.9% of total congressional co-sponsorship | Drives floor momentum and committee hearings in House Ways and Means |
| United States Senate | 10 Senators | Bipartisan leadership including Sen. Adam Schiff (D–CA) and Sen. Tim Scott (R–SC) | Drives companion legislation and fiscal evaluation in Senate Finance Committee |
| Grand Congressional Total | 62 Lawmakers | Unified Bipartisan Coalition | Positioned for enactment during the year-end lame-duck session |
The bill has been formally referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Finance, the two primary congressional bodies responsible for federal tax policy. Legislative strategists, entertainment executives, and hospitality lobbyists are actively maneuvering to attach the Revitalization Act to broader year-end legislative packages during the high-stakes lame-duck congressional session following the national elections.
By pairing the measure with broader economic competitiveness, manufacturing revitalization, and regional job creation initiatives, backers are positioning the bill as a win-win economic policy that simultaneously restores domestic manufacturing jobs and bolsters the American travel and tourism economy.
Small-Town Case Studies: Blueprints for Enduring Regional Screen Economies
The transformative potential of the Revitalization Act is already visible across several pioneering American regions that have leveraged state-level film incentives to restructure local economies. These success stories demonstrate how cinematic exposure can transform sleepy rural hamlets into high-yielding, year-round tourism destinations.
A prime illustration is found in Georgia's "Southern Hollywood" corridors. In the small town of Senoia, located approximately 35 miles south of Atlanta, the selection of its historic downtown as the primary backdrop for the internationally acclaimed television series The Walking Dead initiated an extraordinary commercial renaissance. Prior to the arrival of production crews, Senoia's historic Main Street was characterized by vacant storefronts and declining agricultural commerce.
During a decade of continuous filming, production spending infused millions of dollars into local trade services and businesses. More importantly, when the series achieved worldwide streaming distribution, Senoia became a global destination for hundreds of thousands of screen tourists. Today, Senoia features upscale boutique hotels, specialty merchandise shops, thriving restaurants, and guided walking tours that celebrate the town's on-screen history. A similar transformation unfolded in Covington, Georgia, where the filming of The Vampire Diaries converted a tranquil courthouse square into an international visitor destination that attracts tens of thousands of dedicated travelers each year.
REGIONAL BLUEPRINTS FOR SCREEN-TOURISM PROSPERITY
| Column 1 |
|---|
| [Georgia: Southern Hollywood] -----> Senoia (The Walking Dead) & Covington (Vampire) |
| Historic downtowns turned into themed shopping |
| and dining corridors; millions in annual taxes |
| [New Mexico: High Desert Trails] --> Albuquerque & Santa Fe (Breaking Bad, Saul) |
| Curated film trails, specialty trolley tours, |
| culinary tie-ins, and museum exhibitions |
| [Mountain West: Modern Western] ---> Montana & Wyoming (Contemporary Western Dramas) |
| Unprecedented surges in dude ranch bookings, |
| luxury lodge occupancy, and outfitter retail |
| [Urban Centers: NYC & California] -> Iconic streetscapes and coastal landmarks linked |
| directly to municipal tourism bureaus and passes |
In the American Southwest, New Mexico's cinematic high desert provides another compelling model. Albuquerque and Santa Fe capitalized on the cultural prominence of series like Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul by formally integrating film locations into municipal tourism marketing. The cities established curated film location trails, private trolley excursions, and specialized culinary events celebrating iconic on-screen dishes. This institutional approach transformed television viewers into lifelong regional travelers who return repeatedly to explore New Mexico's rich Native American and Hispanic cultural heritage.
Across the Mountain West, rural communities in Montana and Wyoming have experienced unprecedented surges in travel demand driven by contemporary Western television dramas. Viewers inspired by sweeping cinematic vistas of rugged mountains and open ranchlands have filled regional airports, driven record dude ranch bookings, and energized local outfitting and western apparel merchants.
These regional examples prove that screen tourism is not an abstract theory; it is a proven economic development model that revitalizes physical infrastructure, creates diversified local jobs, and instills profound civic pride in communities that might otherwise be overlooked by traditional tourism marketing.
Global Competitiveness: Neutralizing International Subsidies Through State-Federal Stacking
To understand why the Revitalization Act is critical for the long-term future of American travel, one must examine the mathematics of global production financing. Modern film studios are multinational corporations accountable to public shareholders and corporate boards. When evaluating where to locate a $100 million feature film or a multi-season television production, corporate finance departments construct detailed comparative models that weigh labor costs, currency exchange fluctuations, and government tax incentives.
In recent years, foreign jurisdictions have won production bids almost entirely on the basis of tax credit math. A production shooting in the United Kingdom or Canada could readily achieve a net savings of $25 million to $35 million compared to shooting in an American state with modest or capped incentives.
| Production Financial Factor | Single State Incentive Model (Without Federal Act) | Stacked Federal + State Incentive Model (With Revitalization Act) | Competitive Foreign Hub Model (UK / Canada / Australia) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Credit Rate | 0% (Absence of federal program) | 20% Base + up to 10% Bonus Tiers (Total: 30%) | 25% – 40% National Incentive |
| State / Regional Rebate | 20% – 30% (Subject to local caps) | 20% – 30% (Fully additive state stacking) | 5% – 10% Provincial / Regional Add-ons |
| Net Production Cost Offset | 20% – 30% Effective Rebate | 40% – 55% Effective Rebate | 35% – 45% Effective Rebate |
| Studio Commercial Decision | High financial incentive to export shoot abroad | Overwhelming financial incentive to remain domestic | Loses cost advantage over stacked US packages |
| Long-Term Tourism Yield | Foreign country captures global streaming visibility | American communities capture multi-year set-jetting | Domestic tourism pipeline lost to foreign rivals |
By introducing a 20% to 30% federal tax credit that stacks seamlessly with state incentives, the Revitalization Act completely neutralizes foreign cost advantages. An entertainment studio evaluating a domestic location can now combine a 25% Georgia or New Mexico rebate with a 25% federal credit, achieving a 50% net offset on qualified labor expenditures.
This shift in capital economics removes the financial justification for exporting productions abroad. In doing so, it ensures that the world's most compelling visual stories continue to be filmed against real American skylines, historic small towns, and breathtaking natural landmarks, securing both the high-wage production jobs of today and the lucrative visitor economies of tomorrow.
Strategic Guidelines for Municipalities and Travelers: Capitalizing on Screen Tourism
As the United States prepares for an anticipated renaissance in domestic film production, both municipal leaders and prospective set-jetting travelers can adopt structured strategies to maximize the mutual benefits of screen tourism.
For small-town civic leaders, economic development directors, and municipal tourism bureaus, capitalizing on film production requires proactive preparation:
First, establish a dedicated local film commission or municipal liaison. Having an empowered, responsive point of contact who can facilitate filming permits, coordinate street closures with local law enforcement, and connect production managers with regional trade vendors is essential for attracting major studio productions.
Second, negotiate the preservation of on-screen assets. Whenever possible, local authorities should collaborate with production designers to preserve recognizable exterior sets, facades, or architectural modifications following the completion of filming. These physical assets serve as the tangible anchors for future walking tours and tourist photography.
Third, develop curated digital tourism collateral. Municipalities should design self-guided mobile walking maps, install discreet historical marker plaques at recognizable filming sites, and partner with local chambers of commerce to promote "film trail" itineraries that guide visitors to nearby diners, cafes, and boutique hotels.
Fourth, implement responsible carrying-capacity safeguards. Screen tourism can occasionally result in localized congestion if popular filming locations are situated in quiet residential neighborhoods. Municipalities must establish clear parking regulations, enforce neighborhood quiet hours, and manage visitor flows to ensure that tourism enhances community vitality without disrupting the quality of life for permanent residents.
For travelers and film enthusiasts planning their own set-jetting itineraries across the United States, adhering to thoughtful travel etiquette ensures a rewarding and authentic journey:
First, research the history and culture of the host community beyond its on-screen appearance. Many of America's most celebrated film towns possess deep historical roots, fascinating architecture, and rich local traditions that predate their cinematic fame.
Second, respect private residential property. While exploring famous film locations, travelers must remember that many houses and buildings featured on screen are private family homes or working commercial businesses. Always admire exteriors from public sidewalks, refrain from trespassing onto private driveways or lawns, and respect the privacy of local residents.
Third, spend locally and deliberately. Direct your vacation expenditure into independent downtown establishments. Dine at family-owned cafes, purchase handcrafted goods from local artisans, and stay at neighborhood bed-and-breakfasts or historic boutique hotels to ensure that your visit directly supports the community that brought your favorite stories to life.
By aligning forward-thinking federal economic policy with local community stewardship and responsible traveler engagement, the United States is poised to usher in a golden age of screen tourism—ensuring that American stories continue to inspire global travelers for generations to come.
Related Travel Guides
- Mandarin Oriental, Canouan Appoints Jonathan Payne as New General Manager
- Greece Elevates Patmos Tourism Visibility in France Through UNESCO Heritage and Slow Food
- Iceland Blue Lagoon Remains Open as Scientists Track Svartsengi Magma Accumulation
- Global Cultural Travel Events and Festivals: Japan, Mexico, Thailand, and Germany
- Global Gastronomic Tourism Market Expansion: Trends Across Singapore, Asia, and Europe
This article is for informational purposes. Flight routes, passenger regulations, visa rules, and transit advisories are subject to change by airlines and aviation authorities. Readers are advised to verify schedules and travel documentation with relevant carriers and border agencies before departure.
Related Stories

Salem vs. New Orleans Halloween 2026: Inside the 22% Booking Surge, 29% Rate Spike, and 400th Anniversary Celebrations

Pennsylvania's 87.5% Heating Oil Surge: What Record Energy Costs Mean for Poconos and Northeast Ski Trips


