Philippines Moves to Eliminate 1977 Travel Tax with Senate Bill 1870 Departure Fee Abolition

Image generated by AI
Lawmakers in the Philippines are advancing Senate Bill No. 1870, known as the Travel Tax Abolition Act, to eliminate mandatory outbound departure taxes of up to ₱2,700 originally introduced under Presidential Decree No. 1183 in 1977.
MANILA, Philippines — The Philippine legislature is accelerating efforts to pass Senate Bill No. 1870, a landmark measure aimed at repealing the country's decades-old travel tax levied on departing international passengers. Enacted nearly half a century ago under Presidential Decree No. 1183, the departure tax was established when international travel was considered an exclusive luxury rather than an essential component of modern employment, education, and family mobility.
Under current regulations, Filipino citizens departing on economy-class international flights pay ₱1,620, while first-class passengers face a ₱2,700 charge—adding a ₱6,480 burden on an average family of four.
The proposed reform seeks to align Philippine departure procedures with regional commitments under the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Tourism Agreement, removing financial deterrents to cross-border travel while shifting state infrastructure and education funding to the national budget.
Legislative Drive to Abolish 1977 Departure Tax Mandate
The historical origin of the travel tax traces back to 1977, when Presidential Decree No. 1183 imposed a mandatory levy on all outbound Filipino travelers. Over the past five decades, global mobility has transformed as hundreds of thousands of Filipinos travel abroad annually for Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) deployment, higher education, medical care, and family reunions.
Public policy advocates and consumer groups have long criticized the statutory tax as an outdated financial impediment that penalizes citizens exercising their constitutional right to travel.
By advancing Senate Bill No. 1870, lawmakers aim to modernize Philippine aviation regulations, reduce airport processing friction, and support household purchasing power amid broader inflation concerns.
Philippines Travel Tax Reform Benchmark Matrix
The reference table below summarizes the statutory rates under Presidential Decree No. 1183, proposed changes under Senate Bill No. 1870, historical revenue allocations, and modern budget replacement mechanisms:
| Regulatory Category | Existing Statutory Rule (PD 1183) | Proposed Reform (Senate Bill 1870) | Historical Revenue & Budget Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economy Class Departure Tax | ₱1,620 per passenger | ₱0 (Completely Abolished) | Direct savings for outbound travelers |
| First Class Departure Tax | ₱2,700 per passenger | ₱0 (Completely Abolished) | Removes tiered luxury travel penalty |
| Family of Four Impact | ₱6,480 total extra outflow | ₱0 extra cost at departure | Preserves household savings for travel |
| TIEZA Infrastructure Funding | >50% of travel tax revenue | General Appropriations Act (GAA) | Funded via annual national budget allocation |
| Higher Education (CHED) | ~40% of travel tax revenue | General Appropriations Act (GAA) | Secured through national budget appropriations |
| Culture & Arts (NCCA) | 10% of travel tax revenue | General Appropriations Act (GAA) | Direct government treasury funding |
| Retroactive Refund Policy | No refunds permitted | Immediate full refund | Applies to tickets paid for flights on/after enactment date |
Breakdown of Departure Fees and Household Savings Impact
The financial burden of the current departure tax structure hits middle-class families and budget travelers particularly hard:
- Economy Passengers: Pay a mandatory ₱1,620 levy per ticket prior to clearing outbound border control.
- First-Class Passengers: Face a ₱2,700 tax per ticket.
- Family Group Outflow: A family of four traveling in economy class incurs a ₱6,480 additional cash outflow before even boarding their aircraft.
Proponents of Senate Bill No. 1870 argue that keeping these funds within household budgets allows travelers to reallocate money toward accommodation, dining, emergency medical buffers, or daily living expenses.
Alignment with ASEAN Tourism Agreement and Cross-Border Connectivity
A primary objective behind the Travel Tax Abolition Act is fulfilling the Philippines’ commitments under the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Tourism Agreement.
The regional agreement encourages member states to eliminate non-tariff barriers, simplify airport departure formalities, and enhance intra-ASEAN passenger connectivity.
By abolishing border departure taxes, the Philippines removes a key competitive disadvantage compared to neighboring Southeast Asian nations like Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore, which do not impose equivalent standalone travel levies on their own citizens.
Refund Mechanics and Full Prohibition of Fee Collection
If Senate Bill No. 1870 is signed into law, both government collection terminals (such as TIEZA counters) and private air carriers will be legally prohibited from collecting departure travel taxes.
To protect passengers during the transition period, the legislation includes explicit retroactive refund provisions:
- Collection Prohibition: All airline booking platforms and airport desks must cease travel tax line-item charges immediately upon official enactment.
- Passenger Refunds: Travelers who have already paid the departure tax for flights scheduled on or after the law’s official date of effectivity will be entitled to an immediate, hassle-free refund through designated channels.
Shifting State Program Funding from Passenger Levies to National Budget
Historically, travel tax revenues were distributed across three main government entities:
- Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (TIEZA): Received more than 50 per cent of collections to fund eco-zones and tourism infrastructure.
- Commission on Higher Education (CHED): Received approximately 40 per cent of funds to support tertiary education programs and scholarships.
- National Commission for Culture and the Arts (NCCA): Received 10 per cent to finance cultural heritage restoration projects.
Unlike previous policy proposals that threatened to defund these agencies, Senate Bill No. 1870 establishes strict structural safeguards. Ongoing tourism, education, and cultural programs will be financed directly through the annual General Appropriations Act (GAA), shifting financial responsibility from individual outbound travelers to the national budget.
Practical Implications for Outbound Filipino Passengers and Travel Agencies
For Filipino travelers and travel management companies, the abolition of the travel tax represents a major simplification of international departure procedures.
From an operational standpoint, eliminating the fee removes long queues at airport TIEZA payment counters, speeds up online check-in workflows, and lowers total ticket costs for international flights originating in Manila (MNL), Cebu (CEB), and Clark (CRK).
Travel industry analysts expect the reform to stimulate outbound leisure travel and cross-border business activities throughout Southeast Asia and East Asia.
Philippine Outbound Traveler Protocol: Managing Travel Tax Requirements
Pending final legislative enactment and presidential signing, travelers should observe the following guidelines:
- Pay Existing Levies Pending Enactment: Outbound passengers must continue paying the mandatory ₱1,620 (economy) or ₱2,700 (first class) fee online or at airport counters until Senate Bill No. 1870 is officially enacted.
- Retain Payment Receipts for Potential Refunds: Keep digital or physical TIEZA receipts for flights scheduled after the bill's anticipated enactment date to claim retroactive refunds once rules take effect.
- Verify Airline Ticket Breakdowns: Check airline e-ticket itineraries to determine whether travel tax fees were pre-included during ticket purchase or require separate settlement.
- Monitor Official Senate and TIEZA Announcements: Stay updated on legislative progress via official Philippine Senate and TIEZA channels for effectivity dates.
Related Travel Guides
Disclaimer
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, travel policies, regulations, and conditions change rapidly. Always verify information with official sources before making travel decisions. Nomad Lawyer makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or suitability of the information provided. Readers should consult qualified professionals for advice specific to their circumstances. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Nomad Lawyer.

Raushan Kumar
Founder & Lead Developer
Full-stack developer with 11+ years of experience and a passionate traveller. Raushan built Nomad Lawyer from the ground up with a vision to create the best travel and law experience on the web.
Learn more about our team →