England to Implement Localized Accommodation Levies by 2028 to Match EU Tourism Models
England plans to allow Mayors to introduce overnight visitor levies by 2028, aligning with EU tourism taxes in France, Italy, and the Netherlands.

Image generated by AI
[LONDON] — England is preparing a significant shift in its tourism funding strategy, moving toward a decentralized visitor charge system that mirrors established models across Continental Europe. Under new proposals, Mayoral Strategic Authorities will be granted the power to implement an Accommodation Levy on overnight stays starting around 2028, marking a departure from traditional national funding and moving toward a localized "user-pays" system.
The initiative is driven by an urgent need for sustainable investment in tourism-heavy regions. By allowing local leaders to capture a portion of the revenue generated by overnight visitors, the government aims to provide cities and regions with the financial autonomy to maintain public spaces, upgrade transportation networks, and enhance visitor services without relying solely on central government grants.
Localized Control Over Tourism Funding
Unlike a blanket national tax, the proposed Overnight Visitor Levy will be governed at the local level. This means that the decision to implement a charge—and the specific rate of that charge—will rest with the Mayoral Strategic Authorities of participating regions. Consequently, travelers may encounter varying costs depending on the specific city or region they visit within England.
The primary objective is to ensure that the areas bearing the brunt of high visitor volumes have the resources to manage the associated pressures. Revenue generated from these levies is earmarked for several key areas of urban and regional development.
| Area | Potential Tourism Benefit |
|---|---|
| Public spaces | Cleaner and improved visitor areas |
| Transport | Better connections for tourists |
| Attractions | Support for tourism facilities |
| Infrastructure | Improved destination management |
Global Benchmarking of Visitor Levies
The move brings England into alignment with a global trend of "destination management" funding. Many of the world's most visited nations have already integrated similar charges to offset the environmental and social costs of mass tourism. Countries such as France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, Portugal, Greece, and Japan all utilize some form of visitor tax.
While some nations apply these taxes at a federal or regional level, England's proposed 2027–2028 rollout focuses on city-based systems. This approach allows for greater flexibility, enabling a city with extreme "overtourism" to set a higher rate than a region seeking to attract more visitors.
Global Tourist Tax Comparison: England vs Other Popular Destinations
| Country / Destination | Tourist Tax Model | Current Rate / Example | Who Pays | Main Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| England (Proposed) | Local overnight visitor levy | Possible percentage-based charge; 5% discussed but not confirmed | Overnight accommodation guests in participating areas | Tourism infrastructure, visitor services, local improvements |
| France | Local accommodation tax (Taxe de séjour) | Approx. €0.65–€15.60 per person/night depending on accommodation type | Hotel and accommodation guests | Tourism development and local services |
| Netherlands (Amsterdam) | Percentage-based accommodation tax | 12.5% of accommodation cost | Overnight visitors | Manage tourism pressure and fund city services |
| Italy (Rome, Venice and others) | City accommodation tax | Around €1–€12 per person/night depending on city and hotel category | Overnight tourists | Infrastructure, cultural sites and tourism management |
| Spain (Catalonia/Balearic Islands) | Regional tourist tax | Varies by region; Barcelona/Catalonia charges based on accommodation type | Hotel and accommodation visitors | Tourism sustainability and local investment |
| Germany (Berlin) | Percentage-based city tax | Around 7.5% of accommodation cost | Hotel guests | City tourism funding |
| Portugal (Lisbon) | Flat overnight charge | Around €4 per person/night in Lisbon | Visitors aged over 13 | Tourism infrastructure |
| Greece | Climate resilience accommodation fee | Around €2–€15 depending on accommodation and season | Accommodation visitors | Climate adaptation and tourism support |
| Switzerland | Local/canton visitor tax | Up to around CHF 7 per person/night | Tourists staying overnight | Visitor services and local benefits |
| Japan | Departure tax | ¥1,000 per traveller leaving Japan | International and domestic departing passengers | Tourism infrastructure improvements |
Comparative Analysis with European Peers
The French Model of Municipal Funding
France provides a historical precedent for this system, having utilized the taxe de séjour since 1910. The French model is deeply integrated into municipal governance, allowing local authorities to collect funds directly from overnight guests to reinvest in the local economy.
| Feature | France | England (Proposed) |
|---|---|---|
| System type | Local accommodation tax | Local overnight visitor levy |
| Decision maker | Municipal authorities | Mayoral Strategic Authorities |
| Rate | Varies by accommodation category | Not confirmed |
| Coverage | Many French tourism destinations | Participating English destinations only |
| Purpose | Tourism development and infrastructure | Tourism funding and visitor services |
Amsterdam's Aggressive Approach to Overtourism
In contrast to flat-rate taxes, Amsterdam employs a high percentage-based levy of 12.5%. This model is specifically designed to curb the negative effects of overtourism by making high-end stays more expensive, thereby generating significant revenue to manage city services. While English discussions have mentioned a potential 5% charge, this remains unconfirmed and would be significantly lower than the Amsterdam model.
| Category | Amsterdam | England Proposal |
|---|---|---|
| Tax style | Percentage-based | Expected percentage-based |
| Rate | 12.5% | Around 5% discussed, not confirmed |
| Control | City government | Mayoral Strategic Authorities |
| Reason | Manage overtourism | Support tourism infrastructure |
Italy's Fixed-Rate Strategy
Italy's system, particularly in hubs like Rome, Venice, and Florence, typically relies on fixed nightly charges that can reach up to €12 per night. This model focuses on the preservation of cultural assets and the protection of historical landmarks from the wear and tear of millions of annual visitors. England's proposed shift toward a percentage-based model suggests a desire to scale the tax based on the luxury level of the accommodation.
| Feature | Italy | England |
|---|---|---|
| Tax method | Usually fixed nightly charge | Likely percentage-based |
| Main destinations | Rome, Venice, Florence | Future English tourism areas |
| Maximum examples | Up to around €12/night | Not confirmed |
| Main goal | Protect tourism assets | Improve tourism services |
Why This Matters (Information Gain & Experience)
For the traveler, this change means that the cost of a hotel stay in England will likely become less predictable. Instead of a standard room rate, visitors will need to account for varying local levies that will appear on their final invoices. From a logistical standpoint, this creates a new layer of pricing transparency requirements for booking platforms and hotels.
From an industry perspective, this move signals a transition toward "Sustainable Tourism." By shifting the financial burden of infrastructure maintenance from the local taxpayer to the visitor, English cities can improve the quality of the tourist experience without raising local taxes. For the high-end traveler, a percentage-based levy means luxury stays will contribute more to the city's upkeep, while budget travelers will see a minimal impact. Ultimately, this creates a more resilient tourism ecosystem where the growth in visitor numbers directly funds the capacity to handle them.
Related Travel Guides
Disclaimer
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, travel policies, regulations, and conditions change rapidly. Always verify information with official sources before making travel decisions. Nomad Lawyer makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or suitability of the information provided. Readers should consult qualified professionals for advice specific to their circumstances. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Nomad Lawyer.

Preeti Gunjan
Contributor & Community Manager
A passionate traveller and community builder. Preeti helps grow the Nomad Lawyer community, fostering engagement and bringing the reader experience to life.
Learn more about our team →